Judgment, priced up front.
No "contact us" to find out what it costs. What has a price has it here; what depends on scope is quoted — and we say which is which.
| product | buyer | includes | price | lead time today |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pilot Referee | Corporate running a quantum pilot | Sealed pre-registration of the success criterion · champion classical baseline in parallel under juez-v1 · decision page + 5-layer report · optional ledger entry | US$15,000–35,000 | your pilot's calendar · never >15% of pilot cost |
| Claim Screening | Fund with a deal · corporate with a pitch on the table | Layers 0–1 + Registry position + class priors; no new runs | US$4,500 | 5 business days |
| Diligence Report | Fund or CVC · pharma evaluating a partnership | Layers 0–5, simulator reproduction against the champion, pre-registration, report + JSON | From US$28,000 | 3–4 weeks |
| Evidence Library — Analyst | Analyst, consultancy, newsroom | Full records, filters, export and alerts. Evidence levels are identical in every tier: what you pay for is depth, not a different truth. | Free to browse · US$149 per seat / month | immediate |
| Diligence + QPU | Claims where the hardware IS the dispute | The above + real hardware at parity; machine cost passed through at cost, capped | From US$45,000Plus QPU time at cost, capped at US$10,000 unless you approve more in writing. | 5–8 weeks (the exception, not the default) |
| Portfolio Scan | Fund or CVC with 3+ positions | 5 screenings + 1 diligence + portfolio evidence ranking | US$42,500Separately: 5 × US$4,500 + US$28,000 = US$50,500. Together, US$42,500. | 6 weeks |
| Sealed Prediction Pack | Biology and chemistry teams | Predictions sealed before the experiment, opened publicly afterwards | US$9,500Four within twelve months, US$30,000. | your experiment's calendar |
| Library — Firm | Funds, consultancies, media | Up to 15 seats + quarterly briefing + shared watchlists | US$1,900 / monthFifteen Analyst seats would cost US$2,235. Buying them separately is never the better deal. | immediate |
See a sample decision page — built on our real verdict V-0012 →
Why this price.
- We do not bill the vendors we judge.
- The classical champion is ours, not theirs.
- The criterion is sealed before the run.
- The artifact outlives the engagement.
Why hire us
Priors nobody can replicate
A catalogue of 74 algorithms over 625 references, plus the tracked claims, give the base survival rate per problem class. Nobody else has it.
A calibrated harness
Tuned champion baselines (CP-SAT / OR-Tools), versioned budget parity, fixed seeds. Replicating it honestly takes weeks of a team — and it is exactly where most comparisons get biased.
Citability
An internal memo does not go to a committee or an LP. An external, sealed, anchored opinion does. We sell transferable opinion with chain of custody, not compute.
A symmetric track record
Four public errata and our own quantum arm published losing. The "yes" is worth something because the "no"s are public.
Speed with a date
5 days to 8 weeks depending on the product, against a 6–18 month academic cycle.
Conditions
- 50% on signature, 50% on delivery. USD.
- Rush under two weeks: ×1.5.
- A private report costs the same as a public one: privacy does not buy the result.
- Evidence levels are identical in the free and the paid tier.
- The Two-Layer Rule: judgment is paid for by those who rely on it, never by the vendor being evaluated.